Matthew S. Nole
Baldwin-Wallace College
November 23, 1998
Abstract
Klippel-Trenaunay Syndrome was first described by two French
doctors, Klippel and Trenaunay in 1900. This congenital vascular
disorder is described by three main symptoms, known as the "triad,"
affecting one or more limbs. The triad consists of cutaneous hemangioma,
varicose veins, and bone and soft tissue hypertrophy. Typically,
the cutaneous hemangioma is a substantial port-wine stain, or
nevus. Varicose veins are easy to identify and often very numerous.
The bone and soft tissue hypertrophy is variable and the affected
limb may be either larger or smaller than the opposite, unaffected
limb. Many treatments for this disorder have been attempted. Although
surgical and non-surgical proc edures have been developed, most
tend to have negative results. Research on this topic has shown
that surgery with this disorder is very risky and often unnecessary.
In severe cases requiring surgery, amputation was most often the
final outcome. Many studies have successfully experimented with
the effects of sclerotherapy on varicose veins. New research on
non-surgical wraps and supports has been developed to decrease
the effects of the symptoms of this disorder on the patients.
Introduction
Klippel-Trenaunay Syndrome is a rare, congenital, vascular disorder
affecting one or more limbs. Klippel-Trenaunay Syndrome was first
noted in a 1900 publication of Archives Generales de Medecine.
In the article, Du Naevis Variquex, Osteo-Hypertrophique, French
physicians Klippel and Trenaunay described a clinical syndrome
with three major symptoms (Gloviczki, 1982). These main symptoms
are often referred to as the "triad." The triad consists of hemangiomas,
bone and soft tissue hypertrophy, and vein varicosities. Hemangiomas
are often apparent at birth, or by two weeks of age (Samuel, 1995).
The hemangioma, or nevus, is usually confined to a part of the
limb. In other cases, the entire limb is affected by the hemangioma
(Samuel, 1995). Capillary hemangiomas are the most common type
and are called port wine stains due to the red and purple color
(Letts, 1977). Bone and soft tissue hypertrophy is a result of
increased growth around an organ. In many cases, limb length is
affected and t he length of the limb is different than the normal
limb. The soft tissue hypertrophy is symmetrical around the affected
extremity. In most cases, the girth of the limb is larger, although
atrophy is common in some patients. Varicose veins are often v
ery noticeable in Klippel-Trenaunay Syndrome patients. Varicose
veins result from damaged or defective valves in a vein. A vein
becomes damaged when the smooth muscle in the wall of veins weakens
and the valves cannot support the weight of blood. T he pressure
on the valve causes it to collapse and it no longer functions
properly. Klippel-Trenaunay Syndrome patients are affected by
other symptoms as well (See Table 1). These symptoms are variably
expressed and may not have identical effects on other patients.
Each case of Klippel-Trenaunay Syndrome is unique. In 1907, Parkes
and Weber described a disorder with the same symptoms involved
in Klippel-Trenaunay Syndrome with the addition of arteriovenous
fistula. This derivative of Klippel-Trenaunay Syndrome was called
Klippel-Trenaunay-Weber Syndrome.
Although the cause of Klippel-Trenaunay Syndrome is still unknown,
there are two theories that have been argued by the medical community.
The first argument is that Klippel-Trenaunay Syndrome is a mesodermal
abnormality during fetal development (Baskerville, 1985). The
mesodermal abnormalities cause vascular and soft tissue malformations
in the effected limb. The other argument states that Klippel-Trenaunay
Syndrome is caused by gene mutation. Although heredity does not
appear to be the cause of Klippel-Trenaunay Syndrome, it is a
possible option (Nielson, 1987). If heredity were the cause, the
mutation would be autosomal recessive due to fact that both sexes
are equally affected and the involvement of this disorder is extremely
sporadic.
Attempts to treat the symptoms to this disorder have included
surgery, sclerotherapy, and compression therapy. Different types
of surgical intervention include vein ligation, vein stripping,
vein resection, and amputation. Vein ligation is a procedure which
clamps or \ldblquote ties off\rdblquote a section of veins. The
clamp prevents blood flow through the damaged section of veins
and promotes blood flow through undamaged veins. Vein stripping
uses a metal wire to remove varicosities from within the damaged
vein. Vein resection, or excision, is a procedure that removes
a section of veins from the body. Amputation is a procedure that
removes a portion of a limb. Digits and extremities are commonly
amputated. The use of Sclerotherapy denies blood flow through
defective veins by introducing chemicals into a specific vein.
The chemical, a sclerosing agent, causes inflammation in the inner
lining of the defective veins. As the inner wall of the vein becomes
inflamed, blood is not permitted to flow through the vein. The
vein later collapses and is broken down and absorbed by the body.
Some of the chemicals used in sclerotherapy include sotradecol,
ethanolamine, and absolute ethyl alcohol. Various forms compression
garments have been developed to control the effects of varicose
veins and hypertrophy caused by edema. These garments have been
effective in reducing the effects of Klippel-Trenaunay Syndrome.
Compression socks, elastic wraps, neoprene wraps and other more
complex devices are used in compression therapy.
The purpose of this study was to compare the final results from
surgical intervention, chemical intervention (sclerotherapy),
and compression therapy in patients with Klippel-Trenaunay Syndrome.
Since compression therapy does not seem to cause further harm
to the body, the focus on my study will look at whether or not
compression therapy is more effective than surgical intervention
and chemical intervention at reducing the effects of Klippel-Trenaunay
Syndrome.
Methods
This study was a collaboration of research p ublished by medical
professionals. A list of published articles pertaining to Klippel-Trenaunay
Syndrome was obtained from the director of the Klippel-Trenaunay
Syndrome support group. Various articles from this list were col
lected from several libraries: Pickerington Public Library, Prior
Library at the Ohio State University, the Health Science Library
at Case Western Reserve University, and the National Organization
of Rare Disorders web page. The articles found from these sources
were carefully reviewed. On November 6, 1998, I presented my findings
to the Biology department at Baldwin-Wallace College in the form
of a Microsoft Power Point presentation. The topics of the presentation
were placed into this paper.
Results
The three predominate studies that were found included a review
of 18 surgical cases, a review of 5 cases that underwent sclerotherapy,
and finally a review of compression therapy on 16 patients with
Klippel-Trenaunay Syndrome affecting their lower extremities.
The first study, by Lindenauer, reviewed 18 cases of surgical
intervention on patients with Klippel-Trenaunay Syndrome (see
Tables 2 and 3). The most common procedures used in this study
were vein ligation and vein excision. One patient was treated
with sclerotherapy. The effect of Klippel-Trenaunay Syndrome on
the patients in this study is written on table 2. In the cases
that did not receive treatment, 40 percent had negative outcomes.
In contrast, 92 percent of the patients who underwent a surgical
procedure had negative results.
The second study, by de Lorimier, treated 5 patients who had
severe cases of Klippel-Trenaunay Syndrome with sclerotherapy.
These patients required between 1 and 30 treatments of sclerotherapy
to treat their malformations. Although quantitative analysis was
not conducted in this study, the recurrence of varicose veins
and hypertrophy was minimal. The patients in this study were very
pleased with the results of sclerotherapy.
The final study, by Stringel and Dastous, concentrated on the
effects of compression therapy in dealing with the symptoms of
Klippel-Trenaunay Syndrome (see Table 4). Of the 16 patients,
81 percent involved in this study showed improvement in their
symptoms of Klippel-Trenaunay Syndrome. None of the patients showed
any signs of negative results.
Discussion
A negative result in these studies was a result of the recurrence
of varicose veins, increased soft tissue hypertrophy or increased
bone tissue hypertrophy. In the study by Lindenauer, the 2 control
cases that were noted as worse almost passed as "no change." The
tendency of these studies seems to be that surgical intervention
has negative results. This is because vein ligation, vein stripping,
and vein resection, or excision, can be potentially harmful to
surrounding tissues. Due to the scaring from these procedures,
damage to surrounding tissues could lead to further complications
after surgery. Although sclerotherapy creates a wound and the
injection site, many believe that it is effective because it is
more localized. The injury site is very small, which decreases
the chance of further damage to the surrounding tissues. Compression
therapy has been very effective in controlling the symptoms of
Klippel-Trenaunay Syndrome. Many studies reviewed have given positive
outlooks to patients using compression therapy. The study by Stringel
reflects these positive views.
In a study by Servelle (1985), the symptoms of Klippel-Trenaunay
Syndrome were artificially duplicated in seven dogs. At one month
of age, the veins in either the groin or popliteal region were
ligated in each of the seven dogs. Hypertrophy of the limb was
evident 12 to 18 months later. This clinical synthesis of Klippel-Trenaunay
Syndrome could be useful in finding better treatments for the
symptoms of Klippel-Trenaunay Syndrome. Compression therapy and
chemical therapy could be compared to surgical intervention in
a laboratory setting. More quantitative analysis needs to be conducted
between surgical intervention, chemical intervention, and compression
therapy. What effect does intervention have on the performance
of the patient after the therapy. Years after the therapy, what
is the extent of the patients Klippel-Trenaunay Syndrome symptoms.
These are a few of the questions that should be looked into when
searching for future research ideas.
Research
Baskerville, P.A. J.S. Ackroyd, and N.L. Browse. 1985. The Etiology
of the Klippel-Trenaunay syndrome. Annals of Surgery. 202(5):624-7
De Lorimier, A.A. 1995. Sclerotherapy For Venous Malformations.
Journal of Pediatric Surgery. 30(2):188-94
Gloviczki, P., L.H. Hollier, R.L. Telander, B. Kaufman, A.J.
Bianco, and G.B. Stickler. 1983. Surgical Implications of Klippel-Trenaunay
Syndrome. Annals of Surgery. 197(3):353-360
Letts, R.M. 1977.Orthopaedic Treatment of Hemangiomatous Hypertrophy
of the Lower Extremity. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. 59(6):777-783.
Lindenauer, S.M. 1965. The Klippel-Trenaunay Syndrome: Varicosity,
Hypertrophy, and Hemangioma with No Arteriovenous Fistula. Annals
of Surgery. 162(2):303-314.
Nielson, J.R. and E.H. Tschen. 1987. Klippel-Trenaunay-Weber
Syndrome. Cutis. 40(1):51-53
Samuel, M. and L. Spitz. 1995. Klippel-Trenaunay Syndrome: Clinical
Features, Complications, and Management in Children. British Journal
of Surgery. 82:757-761.
Servelle, M. 1985. Klippel and Trenaunay's Syndrome, 768 Operated
Cases. Annals of Surgery. 201(3): 365-373.
Stringel, G. and J Dastous, 1987. Klippel-Trenaunay Syndrome
and Other Cases of Lower Limb Hypertrophy: Pediatric Surgical
Implications. Journal of Pediatric Surgery. 22(9): 645-650.
Table 1 - Secondary symptoms of KTS
| Arteriovenous fistulae |
an abnormal communication between an artery and a vein,
bypassing the capillary bed |
| Cellulitis |
Infection of the skin or connective tissues |
| Edema |
abnormal swelling of some part of the body due to retention
of fluid in body tissues |
| Lymphangioma |
Mass of lymphatic vessels or channels that vary in size |
| Pelvic Asymmetry |
|
| Pelvic Nonfusion |
|
| Phlebitis |
Inflammation of a vein |
| Thrombophlebitis |
Clotting within an inflamed vein |
| Thrombosis |
Clotting within a vein |
| Tumors |
An abnormal swelling or mass |
Table 2 - The symptoms of KTS displayed by the 18 surgical
cases in study #1.
| Lower Limb |
94% |
| Symptoms at birth |
100% |
| Hemangioma |
83% |
| Limb - Length Difference |
83% |
| Soft Tissue Hypertrophy |
88% |
| Varicosities |
100% |
| Average age |
25.7 years |
Table 3 - Procedures and results of 18 surgical cases involved
in study #1.
# |
Extremity |
Onset |
Hemangioma |
Length |
Girth |
Varicosities |
Venogram |
Treatment |
Result |
1 |
Left Lower |
Birth |
Extensive |
Greater |
Greater |
Marked |
Absent Deep Calf Veins |
Ligation and Stripping |
Worse |
2 |
Right Lower |
Birth |
Extensive |
Greater |
Greater |
Marked |
Absent Deep
Veins |
None |
Worse |
3 |
Right Lower |
Birth |
Moderate |
Greater |
Less |
Very Marked
|
No Deep Veins |
None |
No Change |
4 |
Left Lower |
Birth |
Extensive |
Shorter |
Less |
Marked |
Absent Deep Veins |
Ligation and Injection |
Worse |
5 |
Right Upper |
Birth |
Extensive |
Greater |
Greater |
Moderate |
Absent Deep
Veins |
None |
Worse |
6 |
Left Lower |
Birth |
Extensive |
Equal |
Greater |
Marked |
Absent Deep Veins |
Ligation and Stripping |
No Change |
7 |
Right Lower |
Birth |
Extensive |
Greater |
Greater |
Marked |
* |
Ligation and Stripping |
Worse |
8 |
Left Lower |
Birth |
None |
Greater |
Greater |
Marked |
No Superficial Femoral Vein |
Ligation |
Worse |
9 |
Right Lower |
Birth |
None |
Greater |
Greater |
Marked |
* |
Excision |
Worse |
10 |
Left Lower |
Birth |
Present |
Greater |
Greater |
Marked |
* |
Ligation and Stripping |
Worse |
11 |
Right Lower |
Birth |
Extensive |
Greater |
Greater |
Marked |
* |
None |
Worse |
12 |
Left Lower |
Birth |
Extensive |
Equal |
Equal |
Marked |
* |
Ligation and Stripping |
No Change |
13 |
Right Lower |
Birth |
Extensive |
Greater |
Greater |
Marked |
* |
Ligation and Stripping |
Worse |
14 |
Right Lower |
Birth |
Present |
Equal |
Equal |
Moderate |
* |
Ligation and Stripping |
Worse |
15 |
Left Lower |
Birth |
None |
Greater |
Greater |
Marked |
No Superficial Femoral Vein |
Exploration, No Superficial
Femoral Vein |
Worse |
16 |
Left Lower |
Birth |
Extensive |
Greater |
Greater |
Marked |
* |
Ligation and Stripping |
Worse |
17 |
Right Lower |
Birth |
Extensive |
Greater |
Greater |
Moderate |
Absent Deep
Veins |
None |
No Change |
18 |
Right Lower |
Birth |
Extensive |
Greater |
Greater |
Marked |
No Deep Veins |
Ligation and Stripping |
Worse |
Red = denotes no treatment Blue = denotes surgical intervention
Table 4 - Procedures and results of 16 cases involved in study
#3.
| Case |
Limb Affected |
Treatment |
Result |
| 1 |
Right lower |
None |
Same |
| 2 |
Left lower |
Shoe Lift |
Improvement |
| 3 |
Right lower |
Compression Garment |
Improvement |
| 4 |
Right lower |
Compression Garment |
Improvement |
| 5 |
Left lower |
Supportive Wrap |
Same |
| 6 |
Left lower |
Compression Garment |
Improvement |
| 7 |
Right lower |
Compression Garment |
Improvement |
| 8 |
Left lower |
Compression Garment |
Improvement |
| 9 |
Right lower |
None |
Same |
| 10 |
Right lower |
Compression Garment |
Improvement |
| 11 |
Right lower |
Compression Garment |
Improvement |
| 12 |
Left lower |
Digit Amputation |
Good |
| 13 |
Left lower |
Compression Garment |
Improvement |
| 14 |
Left lower |
Compression Garment |
Improvement |
| 15 |
Right lower |
Compression Garment |
Improvement |
| 16 |
Both Legs |
Digit Amputation |
Good |